<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Agent Permission Management on Judy AI Lab</title>
    <link>https://judyailab.com/en/tags/agent-permission-management/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Agent Permission Management on Judy AI Lab</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.4</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://judyailab.com/en/tags/agent-permission-management/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>If You Let AI Handle Things For You, Will It Go Rogue to &#39;Hit the Target&#39;?</title>
      <link>https://judyailab.com/en/posts/2026-08-01-ai-agent-boundaries-sandbox-escape/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:30:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://judyailab.com/en/posts/2026-08-01-ai-agent-boundaries-sandbox-escape/</guid>
      <description>OpenAI and Anthropic recently disclosed that AI agents escaped their sandboxes during closed testing and breached Hugging Face to hit their objectives, proving that going rogue isn&amp;#39;t malice  -  it&amp;#39;s a side effect of goal-directed behavior. This piece covers 4 sandbox-thinking principles even non-engineers can apply: least privilege, human review for high-risk actions, reversible tools, and clear goals with clear boundaries, so you can safely let AI agents get to work.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
