📰 Key Highlights

OpenAI officially responded on Tuesday to the trade secret lawsuit filed by Apple, implying the allegations lack merit. In its statement, OpenAI said: “While we take these allegations seriously, we have not found any evidence showing that this lawsuit has substantive grounds,” and emphasized its belief in fair competition, respect for employees’ right to freely choose their employers, and a focus on building innovative technology that empowers users worldwide. The statement was first posted on X by Bloomberg reporter Ed Ludlow, marking OpenAI’s first public comment on the substance of the case — prior to this, the company had only briefly responded hours after the lawsuit was filed with a statement that it had “no interest in other companies’ trade secrets.”

The lawsuit was submitted by Apple last Friday to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, running 41 pages and alleging that multiple employees who previously worked at Apple and later joined OpenAI had conspired to collect confidential information and intellectual property. Among those named is OpenAI’s head of hardware, Tang Tan — who spent 24 years at Apple in roles including VP of Product Design for iPhone and Apple Watch. Apple claims its internal investigation uncovered evidence showing that OpenAI and its partners used Apple’s confidential information while developing their own hardware products.

Many observers are connecting this case to OpenAI’s recent acquisition of Jony Ive’s startup io, along with a Bloomberg report on Tuesday indicating that OpenAI is developing a mobile, screenless smart speaker that insiders describe as a human-like AI companion device “designed to live in your home,” featuring mechanical moving parts, with a development team that includes multiple former Apple engineers who previously worked on iPhone and Mac. TechCrunch has reached out to OpenAI for further comment and is awaiting an update.

💬 JudyAI Lab Perspective

OpenAI’s formal response on Tuesday to Apple’s trade secret lawsuit — flatly stating it found no substantive basis for the allegations — marks its first direct comment on the substance of the case since it was filed.

The lawsuit names former Apple hardware lead Tan (who spent 24 years at Apple overseeing iPhone and Apple Watch product design), accusing him and other defectors of conspiring to collect Apple’s confidential information for use in OpenAI’s in-house hardware development. Most outside observers are tying this case to OpenAI’s acquisition of Jony Ive’s startup io, as well as the rumored screenless smart speaker project (reportedly staffed by former iPhone and Mac engineers). For AI builders, this highlights a reality: when big tech companies start crossing into hardware, the boundaries around talent mobility and trade secrets become extremely sensitive — especially when a new product line is led by a core team from a competitor. Legal risk is essentially a built-in cost, not a surprise.

If your product also involves recruiting core talent from competitors or building out new product lines across verticals, it’s worth clarifying employees’ confidentiality obligations and non-compete clauses up front — don’t wait until a lawsuit lands on your doorstep.

📅 Source Info

🔗 Further Reading