📰 Key Highlights

Sandwich chain Jersey Mike’s recently filed its IPO paperwork, and one detail caught the attention of tech media: this S-1 filing — the document used to communicate with investors — mentions “artificial intelligence” or the abbreviation “AI” a full 22 times. By comparison, “software” appears 52 times and “data” a whopping 112 times — yet the company’s core business is selling submarine sandwiches, not AI products.

In its risk-factors section, the company tacked on AI-related language, but only with vague phrasing like “we are beginning to use AI technology in our business” — no mention of specific use cases and no explanation of what material risks the technology might pose to investors. This kind of “boilerplate warning” has become a recognized playbook in IPO filings.

The author uses this example to point out that AI hype has entered a new phase: it’s no longer just tech startups sprinkling “AI fairy dust” during fundraising — even traditional fast-food franchise chains are now shoving AI into their legal paperwork. For contrast, the article mentions that Starbucks once rolled out a so-called AI-powered inventory management tool that was recently pulled after it couldn’t even count properly.

The author closes with a touch of irony: Jersey Mike’s actually had a Texas location genuinely struck by lightning back in 2021, yet “weather” only gets 5 mentions in the S-1, and “lightning” — zero. In other words, a company that sells real sandwiches is about as likely to get bitten by AI tech as it is to get struck by lightning again — and lightning arguably deserves a spot in the risk disclosures far more than AI does.

💬 JudyAI Lab Take

A sandwich chain that mentions “AI” 22 times in its IPO filing yet can’t spell out a single concrete application — this isn’t an isolated case. It’s a signal that AI hype has fully invaded the legal documents of traditional industries.

From Starbucks’ claimed AI-driven inventory tool getting pulled because it couldn’t even count correctly, to Jersey Mike’s stuffing AI into risk disclosures with nothing but fuzzy phrasing like “we are beginning to use AI technology,” what we’re watching is a new kind of “AI disclaimer culture” taking shape. Companies treat AI as a universal talisman — mention it and you look like you’re keeping up with the trend; skip it and you seem behind. This is a signal worth noting for the AI builder crowd: when clients or investors start asking “does your product have AI?” instead of “what problem does your AI solve?”, the real technical value gets diluted by marketing packaging.

The article lands its punchline with irony — the risk of lightning hitting a store is way more concrete than any AI risk, yet it’s practically invisible in the filing. That alone shows just how performative these AI disclaimer clauses have become.

Next time you drop “AI” into a proposal or product brief, try also writing down what problem it solves, what the failure scenarios look like, and what real risks it poses to users — those three lines are more honest than any marketing buzzword.

📅 Source Info

🔗 Further Reading