<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Real Stories on Judy AI Lab</title>
    <link>https://judyailab.com/en/categories/real-stories/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Real Stories on Judy AI Lab</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.4</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 05:01:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://judyailab.com/en/categories/real-stories/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI Self-Review Pipeline: How We Got Agents to Review Their Own Code Before Sending PRs</title>
      <link>https://judyailab.com/en/posts/ai-self-review-pipeline-quality-gates/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 05:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://judyailab.com/en/posts/ai-self-review-pipeline-quality-gates/</guid>
      <description>When an AI Agent says &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s done,&amp;#39; what&amp;#39;s your first reaction? At Judy AI Lab, our experience shows: no matter what it says, first check if it&amp;#39;s gone through the five stages. Starting from real pitfalls, sharing the design logic behind multi-Agent quality gates — acceptance criteria defined by humans, let Agents achieve them, get the order right and the results will follow. Keywords: AI Agent Quality Management, Automated Code Review, Multi-Agent Systems.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
